Classic Science is Useless
Saving Earth Newsletter 93
Saving Earth Newsletter 93
Creating The New Motion
The New Motion of Science
Classic science is useless.
This is a direct consequence of its infestation with materialism.
It did not start out that way. Many of the early developers of science were deeply spiritual. Some were seeking to discover the Creator by studying Their creation. Others were simply deeply religious and saw no conflict between science and religion. [1]
This was changed by a campaign (directed behind the scenes by the opposition) which convinced:
· The religious,
· Followers of science, and
· The general public,
that science and religion were fundamentally antagonistic to each other and could not be reconciled.
In the 19th century, this campaign included efforts to discredit religion by convincing the public that the church had foolishly taught that Earth was flat. However, this was never true. Educated people (including church fathers) have known that Earth was spherical since at least the fourth century B.C., and the church has never taught otherwise. [2]
The distortions of this campaign separated:
· Religion from the Idea of proof, and
· Science from the Idea of spirituality.
Had the two fields worked together, they would have long since proven the reality of The Soul and of The One Life.
However, separated by this distortion, they failed in their fundamental purpose of helping Humanity rediscover who we are, why we are here, and what we are here to do.
Oh, there have been lots of attempts by advocates of one field to use the other to support their own perspective (which is ironic considering past efforts to discredit each other). However, those using the other field almost always distort the field they are misusing. As a result, a close examination of their supposed proof reveals the distortion. We see this, for instance, in the use of flawed methodology and cherry-picked evidence to support pre-determined conclusions.
This flawed approach is used by both those who identify with spirituality, and those who identify with science.
We might be more forgiving of those of faith who misuse science in this way, as they often do not understand scientific methodology.
However, we tend to be less forgiving of scientists who use flawed methodology and cherry-picked evidence to support their pre-determined conclusions about spirituality. They, after all, should realize what they are doing. However, scientists are often so prejudiced against spirituality that they do not realize what they are doing.
Unfortunately, both sides are so blinded by this prejudice that they often adopt an “the end justifies the means” attitude.
The idea that “the end justifies the means” is another distortion created by the opposition. In actuality, the end result is determined by the intent plus the means or method.
If the intent:
· Is Separative, then the result will always be harmful to The One Life.
· Is of The One Life, then the result may support The One Life.
If the method:
· Is the classic creative process, then the result will always include opposition to the intent.
· Is the new creative process, then the result will always Serve The One Life.
Despite its spiritual origins, because of its materialism, science has separated itself from The One Life.
“Pure” science has become the quest for knowledge for the sake of knowledge. This purpose isolates science, cutting it off from everything else. Thus, the results of pure science can only harm The One Life.
Pure scientific knowledge is harmful because it is based on and promotes the illusion of separation. The fundamental harm is the illusion itself. However, most science is much more harmful than pure science.
The majority of science is not performed for the sake of knowledge alone. Private-sector research is a tool for those pursuing material wealth and power. [3] The combination of this extremely selfish purpose and materialistic method is very dangerous. The results are often extremely harmful to The One Life and Humanity. It is harmful because: [4]
1. The inherent bias and conflicts of interest:
· Prioritize profit over public good.
· Influence research outcomes.
· Undermine scientific integrity.
2. Limited transparency and access to knowledge:
· Proprietary data and findings reduce public knowledge and accountability.
3. Potential for social harm due to:
· Misinformation and manipulation.
· Ethical concerns.
· Narrow research agendas.
4. Potential for pandemics:
· Private research, particularly in areas like pathogen manipulation, could potentially pose pandemic risks if not conducted under strict regulations and oversight.
Because of this, classic Piscean science is inevitably harmful to The One Life, and of no use to us in our efforts to Serve that Life.
The New Science
In contrast, Synthetic Aquarian science is an instrument of Service to The One Life. That new science is a method of:
· Realizing The Truth about that Life,
· Realizing our Purpose, Place, and Function within It, and
· Obtaining the Knowledge we need in order to Serve The One Life.
We will explore how world servers will use the new science as we proceed.
This is how we will save the world.
In our next Newsletter post, we will explore The New Motion of Spirituality.
May the Light, Love, and Power of The One Life be with you.
[1] This includes such influential early leading figures as: Isaac Newton, Johannes Kepler, Galileo Galilei, Gregor Mendel, Robert Boyle, Blaise Pascal, and Michael Faraday (among others).
[2] See: Flat Earth: The History of an Infamous Idea, by Christine Garwood, 2008.
[3] In 2022 78% of all U.S. research and development was funded by the private sector.
[4] These results were assisted by a Google search.